Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Tvcenter Pro Pinnacle Mac

Tonsils and emotions ... for a debate on February 4!


Emotions ... in our brains through our body and immaterial?
Much research exploring the link between certain brain structures (including the amygdala) and emotions. New neuroimaging techniques (including the
fMRI) produce results that require us to rethink, among others - the question of the seat of emotions. They reveal how some areas are activated when emotions occur, including the amygdala (The hippocampus and amygdala (not those at the bottom of the gorge, which is at the center of the brain ...).

Source: http://www.socialliteracytoday.com/?page_id=74

Two Recent research highlights links between their functioning, size or lack thereof and emotions.
Biologists are probably inclined to believe that one day we can explain emotions in terms of neuronal activity in the brain's complex system without necessarily having seriously challenged assumptions.
The literary and philosophical than I could cross disbelieve that science may one day explain the emotions and cry reductionism, sometimes without really bothered to understand these new studies.
So the question of body and mind arises in a new way:

On 4 February, four senior specialists will share their views: a rare chance to have such different perspectives but all high-level meeting to discuss!
C is that fMRI is still a new field for many. This day is an opportunity to understand the technical potential but also to put into perspective the findings. An example of fMRI during visual stimulation to the right. Source:
Purves (2001) To be able to make informed judgments about publications, to answer questions from students.
Or just to have fun listening to a stimulating debate! Since it remains

space in the room, I take the initiative to say that the day is open to all!





training for teachers of biology, philosophy and all others! not
brain imaging: should we rethink human emotional?

Friday, February 4, 2011
Open to all: MS Room 160 8:30 Unimail




Description of functional MRI techniques, discussion of their limitations using examples in the field of emotions, decision making of the face and voice recognition and attachment.

- Psychoanalytic Insight report on the body / mind in the emotions.
- Neurobiology: the biological perspective on the examples cited.
- Lighting philosophical: the relation between body and mind.
- Debate and confrontation of perspectives.

To be part of continuing education OP-10401
or contact E. Scheidegger here Two examples of recent research supporting the idea instead of a neurological basis for emotions: Of everything I have chosen two examples published lately, not directly related fMRI, as it will be presented on February 4 but which are accessible and beautiful open questions. And you'll want to attend the day? Both speak of the amygdala, a bilateral structure the size of two kernels (hence its name amygdala)
For more information on the amygdala: cf Purves here



  • Fig 1: This is the amygdala
- which is

singular
even if it is bilateral said Ivan Rodriguez - in the nervous system (it is part of the limbic system) and not the tonsils the back of the throat (secondary immune organ)! The amygdala was greater for more social beings? How many friends you could be predicted by the size of the tonsil (See fig 1) found in a wide range of vertebrates, reports
Weave

Dr. Janelle . (2010 in a news item in Nature (
here).

Fig 2: The size of the amygdala reveal the extent of an individual's social network. [ img] Source: Brad Dickerson

Amygdala Researchers
Bickart, KC, et al. (2010) compared the size of this structure (See fig. 1) in 58 healthy adults and asked them how many friends they had and how many groups they belonged. Participants who had a social network larger and more complex had the tonsil (s) larger (s) see Fig 3.
Fig 3: The total size of 2 parts of the amygdala correlates with the number of people in the social network and the number of groups. (Source: Bickart, KC, et al. (2010) )


Amygdala volume correlates with social network size and complexity. The nature of this relationship-volume social network remains mysterious to the authors. Perhaps the well-known role of this structure in face recognition, emotions and emotional memory effect that one develops and maintains relationships said one of the authors. We know that correlation is not causality! It is possible that this is the opposite: the size of the amygdala would be the result of a complex social network and not the cause. Kevin Ochsner, Columbia University in New York said it could even be both at once (sociability increased the size of the amygdala, which allows more sociability which increases the size, ...). It also considers the strength of evidence for this article will make it a classic.
A woman without fear and amygdala ...
A woman of 44 years - out of respect for her anonymity authors call SM - has been studied extensively: she fears nothing, not snakes or spiders, or horror movies. She sees no fear in the faces of others, his eyes not looking at the face and signs of emotion as the others. Adolphs, R., et al. (2005) see cons below:
Cassandra Willyard (2010) reported in Science now (
here)

, we found the reason: two black holes where there should be her amygdala, following a
rare genetic disease (Urbach-Wiethe).



Fig 4: The authors compare a scan of 10 years ago and now B shows the disappearance of the amygdala targeted SM-doesn't follow eye pattern


. " I admit I had trouble watching them, but I'm not specialist. To the right is a dangerous snake handlers SM and a tarantula has even tried to touch. (Source: Feinstein, et al. (2011)

Feinstein, JS, et al (2011) writing in Current Biology here that this woman does not respond to many stimuli that normally cause fear. As shown in Figure 4, his emotional reactions are normal in almost all cases except a lack of fear response. They even tried Shining and the silence of the lambs without it reacts!


Fig 5: The emotional reactions of HM
to movies

Emotions SM comparee
are normal, except for fear. (Source: Feinstein, et al. (2011)

This case reinforces the thesis that emotions are the result of the interaction of these neurons in various parts of the brain and the amygdala plays a crucial role. Fig 6: The dual circuit of emotions . (source:



Dubuc, Bruno (2008). , More specifically, it reinforces the idea dear to Damasio, one of the authors, that emotions are bodily symptoms under control of the amygdala, in fact, directly produced by the stimuli which we realize. In this view, emotions are the accelerating pulse, sweating, dry throat, ... and then we would realize our emotions through the body. Damasio Antonio: "The rational choice does not exist" (Research- intranet) Damasio, AR, & White, M. (2001). The error Descartes: Paris: Odile Jacob. On the other hand, the absence of the amygdala when the malfunction does not prove that's where all what constitutes the emotion of fear occurs, it shows that this structure is necessary to fear. As if we remove the spark plugs of a car and it rolls over, we can deduce that they are necessary, but not that candles cause the wheels are
the engine! it does not prove that any mechanics is useless and to repair the car should make incantations rather as examine rigorously its operation ...

    Separate the emotions of the body? K. Scherrer
  • extracts intranet (Ietemp) In bio springboard
A reflection on the limitations of fMRI Emotions and love (17 September 2010 brain imaging: is rethink the human emotional?
) Emotions and development of teenagers: March 5, 2008 Aggressive teens visualized in the brain?
    Emotions and pheromones May 29, 2009
  • mice detect the disease at the smell ...
  • Science is not done certainties
  • If you are sure of your point of view,
  • are a scientist, doubt,
come to nuance a little !
If you doubt, come to support the views of hard facts ...

That there are people much more knowledgeable than others is not very intriguing. What is extraordinary, and devilishly instructive is how two people with close acquaintances may differ in how they interpret them. Placed, as to know, about the same point they observe worlds that seem to have nothing in common irreducibilities Such interpretations are more rewarding than the differences in areas of knowledge. An author

not wiser than his readers but which includes know in a way that surprised the dumbfounded and even shocking, gives them an author who has more to offer than their larger knowledge that theirs. If you're left, read the right authors, if you are rational, read mystical (and symmetrically, course)! Stimulation of the disagreement arises. Nobody knows what they think when we understand the reasons of those who think otherwise.

Nordon, D. (2007)
. Provided I do not understand!
take advantage of this special day to take the measure of a fascinating debate that is sure to appear in class!

Sources

Adolphs, R., Gosselin, F., Buchanan, TW, Tranel, D., Schyns, P., & Damasio, AR (2005). A Mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature, 433 (7021), 68-72. doi: 10.1038/nature03086
Bickart, KC, Wright, CI, Dautoff, RJ, Dickerson, BC & Barrett, LF (2010). Amygdala volume and social network size in human. Nat Neurosci
, advance online publication
. doi: 10.1038/nn.2724
Dubuc, Bruno. (2008),


The brain at all levels. Mc Gill

  • Feinstein, JS, Adolphs, R., Damasio, A., & Tranel, D. (2011). The Human Amygdala And The Induction and Experience of Fear. [Doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.042 ]. Current Biology (In Press, Corrected Proof). extracts-intranet.pdf Nordon, D. (2007). Provided I do not understand! For Science. (December 2007), 5.
    Purves, et Al (2001) Neuroscience
  • Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates, Inc..
  • Weave
  • Dr. Janelle
  • . (2010). Amygdala
  • at the Centre of your social network. Nature News 26 December 2010 biology. To explore how we could keep alive the link between research and teaching.

0 comments:

Post a Comment